One compatible workflow is tightly bounded
Use existing systems, standard triggers/actions, basic testing and handover.
A reliable connection needs a source of truth, authorised access, defined field movement and a plan for duplicates, failed deliveries and future changes.
A connection can be technically possible and still be the wrong operating design. The useful questions concern authority, access, minimum data and failure ownership.
An API, webhook, connector, export or manual review may each be appropriate. The route is assessed from the actual requirement, not selected from a logo list.
The integration contract turns technical possibilities into decisions that can be tested and owned.
Define what starts the hand-off, who may cause it and any timing assumption the technical route supports.
Name the system of record, stable identifiers, matching rules and manual-review cases.
Map only necessary fields, transformations, validation, direction and blank or invalid behaviour.
Assess account ownership, permissions, credential responsibility, supplier constraints and revocation.
Define repeated-event handling, idempotency where appropriate, retry limits and visible recovery.
Agree logs, monitoring, test cases, acceptance, documentation, support and when changes require retesting.
A custom connection is not the default answer, and no compatibility is confirmed before assessment.
Use existing systems, standard triggers/actions, basic testing and handover.
Scope multiple systems, custom logic, complex data, permissions or exception handling.
Assess one defined problem and up to three relevant systems before implementation.
Route custom software, portals or missing business capabilities to bespoke delivery.
The delivery plan must cover normal and non-normal tests, visible records, handover and who owns supplier or business changes after launch.
Potentially. We assess systems, authorised routes, ownership, permissions, identifiers, fields, exceptions and support before confirming delivery.
Not necessarily. A built-in feature, export/import or manual review may be more appropriate for the actual event and recovery needs.
We identify the record, business purpose and responsible system or team, then document identifiers and permitted update directions.
The design defines repeated-event recognition, safe retries and manual review, using stable references or idempotency where appropriate.
Relevant errors, missing data, supplier downtime and rejected requests should be surfaced, recorded and recovered by a named owner.
A tightly scoped compatible workflow may start from £499; broader work from £999; uncertain/custom routes begin with £399 Technology Discovery. Final scope and separate costs are agreed first.
Show us where a record, task or customer context needs to move. We will identify the smallest responsible technical route.
Discuss an integration