← All solutions

Connect your systems without losing control of the process.

Map the system of record, minimum useful data, next action and failure route before promising that two tools should connect.

The problem is rarely “we need an integration”.

The visible symptom may be copying details between tools. Underneath it, two teams may trust different records or nobody may see when a hand-off fails.

A connection is useful only when it makes a customer or operational hand-off clearer and supportable. Capability alone is not a reason to build it.

Build the hand-off map before the connection.

Define six operating decisions before confirming a technical route.

  1. Start with the event

    Name the one approved event that begins the hand-off and whether a person must confirm it.

  2. Name the system of record

    Agree where the trusted customer, booking, order or task record belongs.

  3. Move minimum useful data

    Define the smallest field set and the operational reason each field crosses.

  4. Specify trigger and action

    Replace “keep everything in sync” with one understandable update, task or notification.

  5. Design failure handling

    Assign missing data, duplicates, rejected requests and supplier outages to a visible recovery path.

  6. Keep access and ownership explicit

    Agree administrators, credentials, approvals, support and change responsibility.

Choose the smallest responsible delivery route.

Do not build a custom connection when a shared record, built-in feature or clearer process solves the problem.

Customer ownership is fragmented

A shared customer record and agreed stages may remove the need for deeper integration.

CRM £99/monthExplore CRM →

One defined trigger and action are clear

Assess a focused workflow using compatible systems and visible exceptions.

Scoped after compatibility reviewExplore AI & Automation →

The route is custom or uncertain

Use discovery for multiple systems, custom connector logic or complex requirements.

Technology Discovery £399Start Technology Discovery →

A connection should earn its operational burden.

Pause when ownership is unclear, a built-in feature is sufficient, the technical route is unsupported or the ongoing dependency is not justified.

  • No blanket compatibility, real-time sync, accuracy, security or compliance claim.
  • Implementation, hosting, monitoring, support, suppliers and usage are separate from Discovery.
  • Credentials use approved secure access methods and least-necessary access is scoped for the work.

Questions about connecting systems

Do you integrate with our existing software?

Potentially. We assess the exact systems, authorised routes, ownership, data, permissions and failure handling before confirming delivery.

What is a system of record?

It is the agreed trusted source for a customer, booking, order or task. Naming it avoids competing versions.

Can you connect CRM to another system?

Possibly, where the workflow and technical route are supportable. We first define ownership, minimum data and exceptions.

What happens when a connection fails?

Failure handling is designed up front: detection, ownership, recovery and the record of what happened. No connection removes every failure scenario.

How do you approach security and access?

Relevant data, roles, administrators and supplier dependencies are identified during discovery, then appropriate controls are scoped.

How much does integration cost?

Technology Discovery is £399 for one defined problem and up to three relevant systems. Implementation and third-party costs are separately scoped.

Bring the hand-off, not a speculative integration list.

Show us where a customer, task or record changes hands. We will help decide whether to configure, connect, improve or leave it alone.

Map one critical hand-off